“The Title Says It All”
No assface..the title does NOT say it all. If you’re going to leave a description about a link you’re posting then explain it to us. Is this an informative article? Oh wait, nothing on Digg is informative anymore…nevermind. Nonetheless, tell us what the article is about, why we should view it, and maybe even a note on how you found it.
“The title says it all” is one of those strings the goddamned digg submission engine should be able to parse out and keep dumbass people like you from posting it. Of course, that’s just perposterous; Digg would never do anything to police itself beyond what is legally required.
If the title said it all, there would be no reason to go to the source and read/view it for ourselves. If the title said it all, you wouldn’t have needed to link to it. You maggots are so goddamned lazy that you can’t even type out: “These picture are hi-res photos of the underside of a butterfly’s wing.” Instead, you post the title “Butterfly Pictures [AWESOME]” then describe it as “Title says it all.” Fuck, if it took me 14 seconds to type that sentence, it took me four years. Show some dedication to being a melonhead.
I know I’m not alone on this one….even the die-hard, hardcore digg fanatics agree with this one. Nobody likes the “Title says it all” bullshit. Cut that shit out, losers.
Filed under: Digg Blows Articles
